Re: Switch-mode Supply For Bug Zapper (Fwd)
Frank Carrier a édité cette page il y a 5 jours


To: High Voltage record Subject: Re: Switch-mode provide for bug zapper (fwd) You need the factors for the steel you intend to make use of. Different types have totally different losses. You obtain this from the mfgr. Digi-Key has some cheap IR kind emitters & detectors. Have the fly crawl a distance, like 4-6 inches inside the tube, and then, he triggers the IR beam which controls the cordless bug zapper. A small single ended NST works great for this application. The present will burn them right up. The fly hits the IR beam on the 1/2 mid-manner point which energizes a small grid in each route. The midpoint has a section 2 inches long with no grid. They turn out to be trapped and cannot exit both course with out getting zapped. You could also use a 600 Ohm to 10K audio xmfr. They make good HV sparks working in a pulsed mode. If the time duration is short, like 1-2 sec, they could also charge a cap rectified with a 1/2 wave diode in a short time period. Then the charged cap waits for the fly. The charging cycle happens each 5 minutes and is controlled by a 555 IC chip --- a small relay controls the power part. You set sugar crystals in the tube and Zappify Bug Zapper site at the tip of the tube use a small glass check tube so you possibly can see your accumulated flies to adjust the time periods. The flies will accumulate after which try to go out the charged grid part. The one we have uses a traditional laminated iron, 50Hz transformer. I'd like, so I'm taking a look at making a switchmode version. 2) Ditto for sizing the parts for the snubber. HV rectification and that I'd need a string of excessive-speed diodes.


Dynatrap makes insect traps that work on the identical precept as others. They entice flying bugs with warmth and carbon dioxide, then catch them and prevent them from escaping. For Zappify Bug Zapper site warmth, they use a fluorescent extremely-violet bulb, which additionally emits Zappify Bug Zapper site-attracting light. The primary difference is that they don’t use propane to create carbon dioxide (CO2). Instead, they use a special process. More on that under. Since they don’t use propane, which means no need to purchase and change cylinders, and better of all, no upkeep issues with clogged strains or failure of the propane to gentle-issues that trouble many different traps. You continue to must plug them in, so you’ll need an outdoor outlet and an extension cord in order for you hang the entice more than 7-10 feet from the outlet. The DT2000XL mannequin is costlier than the DT1000 mannequin, but it’s bigger, with a stronger fan and shiny mild, portable bug zapper for patio rechargeable bug zapper and might attract bugs from farther away, with protection up to an acre for Zappify Bug Zapper site the DT2000XL and a half-acre for the DT1000, in line with the producer.


If you’ve definitely decided not to buy a propane mosquito trap, that is the next neatest thing. I’ll record the pros and cons of the two fashions together, as a result of they’re comparable. Its initial cost is cheaper than propane traps. It doesn’t require the problem and expense of changing propane tanks. It catches different bugs in addition to mosquitoes, though that’s not all the time good if they’re beneficial ones. You can use it indoors or outdoors. The one sound is the quiet humming of the fan and there’s no odor. It’s secure for pets, kids and the atmosphere, because it makes use of no insecticides. The large one: it doesn’t essentially kill mosquitoes specifically, so you could get more moths or different issues as an alternative. You’ll must mount it about 5 to 6 ft off the bottom. One model, the DT1200, comes with its personal hanger, but in any other case, Zappify Bug Zapper site it needs a tree branch, post, ZappifyBug.com wall, fence, and so on. to hang or sit on.


If you use it outdoors, it might have some rain shelter to prevent water from stepping into the gathering area. It wants an outlet 7-10 feet away or an extension cord. It’s difficult to empty without letting some bugs escape. The declare that it emits an efficient amount of CO2 has been questioned. Like all traps, it needs positioned in a very good location, shady and sheltered, the place mosquitoes can discover it, but not where you’ll be bothered by them. The lights in the top of the trap emit warmth and ultraviolet rays, which attract mosquitoes as well as different insects, particularly moths at evening. There are openings below the lights the place bugs can fly in. Once inside, they’re sucked down by the fan’s air currents into the retaining cage beneath, the place they’re unable to flee and die within a day. Unfortunately, light and warmth are simply two of the things that appeal to mosquitoes, since what they’re mainly in search of are folks to chew.


Carbon dioxide is what they really search, since we and different animals emit it when we exhale. Mosquitoes know that if they observe that vapor path, there will probably be a tasty animal on the other finish, able to be bitten. To produce carbon dioxide, the Dynatrap makes use of a broad sort of funnel above the fan, coated with titanium dioxide (TiO2). The producer claims that when the ultraviolet light reacts with the TiO2, "a photocatalytic response takes place that produces carbon dioxide." That is the process it makes use of, as a substitute of burning propane like different traps. However, when the University of Wisconsin tried to measure the quantity of carbon dioxide emitted, they reported that they detected none at all. One reviewer identified that the TiO2 surface would want coated with a source of carbon, like mud or dead bugs, in order for the method to make carbon dioxide. See the assessment here (scroll all the way down to Dr. Marsteller’s comment).